Jeffro, I wasn't just indicating that I had a hard time finding religious Jewish commentaries on the book of Daniel. t was saying that I had a hard time finding religious Jewish commentaries on the Hebrew Bible, or on any sections of it.
When I go to the books section of thrift stores (Including the large bins of books often found at the local Goodwill Outlet stores) I find far more Christian religious books than Jewish religious books. Furthermore, most of the Jewish religious books I find (other than Jewish OT Bibles and prayer books) are about religious rituals, rather than books teaching theological doctrine or explanation, explaining verses in the OT, or explaining Bible prophecy. Years ago in a thrift store I found a few Jewish OT Scriptures commentaries in English at a thrift store. I think there are some Jewish OT Scripture commentaries in a local large book store, and perhaps I will go there to read such books there. But for now I prefer to find and read some (in English, not in Hebrew) online, but so far I found virtually none online.
The WT has written that about the year 30 C.E. a number of Jews were expecting the arrival of the Jewish Messiah, and that such expectations were based upon their calculations of the 70 weeks prophecy in the book of Daniel. [Is that a false teaching of the WT or were Jews back then really doing such?] If some of the ancient Jews were doing such, then that shows that a number of early first century Jews considered the book of Daniel to be prophetic - even though the book was classified in the Writings or would later be classified in the Writings. I have long thought (and even still think it is likely) that the WT is correct in saying that a number of very early first century C.E. Jews made calculations of the 70 weeks prophecy, and that as a result of doing such they were anticipating the arrival of the Messiah around the year 30 C.E.
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/world/middleeast/06stone.html is an interesting news article which is related to the above. The title of the article is "Ancient Tablet Ignites Debate on Messiah and Resurrection". It says in part the following.
'Much of the text, a vision of the apocalypse transmitted by the angel Gabriel, draws on the Old Testament, especially the prophets Daniel, Zechariah and Haggai.
... Mr. Knohl contends that the stone’s writings are about the death of a leader of the Jews who will be resurrected in three days.
He says further that such a suffering messiah is very different from the traditional Jewish image of the messiah as a triumphal, powerful descendant of King David.
“This should shake our basic view of Christianity,” he said as he sat in his office of the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem where he is a senior fellow in addition to being the Yehezkel Kaufman Professor of Biblical Studies at Hebrew University. “Resurrection after three days becomes a motif developed before Jesus, which runs contrary to nearly all scholarship. What happens in the New Testament was adopted by Jesus and his followers based on an earlier messiah story.” '
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah_ben_Joseph .
----------
https://jwtalk.net/topic/32011-rolf-furuli-new-book/ gives a summary of Rolf Furuli's book called When Was The Book Of Daniel Written? In part it says the following.
"6. Antiochus IV Epiphanes All the verses in chapters 7, 8, and 11 in Daniel that are believed to describe the history of Antiochus are discussed in detail. It is shown that modern Bible translators manipulate their translation of some verses, so they fit the history of Antiochus. It is also shown that the few sources that describe the actions of Antiochus are contradictory, and these sources are to some extent manipulated as well. The conclusion of the chapter, contrary to the almost universal agreement, is that Antiochus is not referred to anywhere in the Book of Daniel.
... The setting of the the book of Daniel is God's kingdom, and not the actions of Antiochus."